MomtoGiuliana Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Radha started a thread asking how a doctor determines whether or not your POTS is hyperadrenergic. I discovered how little I know as I tried to help answer the question.What I did find on some reading -- and I still may be off on this-- is that there are at least two variants of POTS: hyperadrenergic and neuropathic. Here is a basic article on neuropathic POTS:Jacob G, Costa F, Shannon JR, Robertson RM, Wathen M, Stein M, Biaggioni I, Ertl A, Black B, Robertson D,The neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 343(14):1008-14. October 2000Here is the Abstract:BACKGROUND: The postural tachycardia syndrome is a common disorder that is characterized by chronic orthostatic symptoms and a dramatic increase in heart rate on standing, but that does not involve orthostatic hypotension. Several lines of evidence indicate that this disorder may result from sympathetic denervation of the legs. METHODS: We measured norepinephrine spillover (the rate of entry of norepinephrine into the venous circulation) in the arms and legs both before and in response to exposure to three stimuli (the cold pressor test, sodium nitroprusside infusion, and tyramine infusion) in 10 patients with the postural tachycardia syndrome and in 8 age- and sex-matched normal subjects. RESULTS: At base line, the mean (+/-SD) plasma norepinephrine concentration in the femoral vein was lower in the patients with the postural tachycardia syndrome than in the normal subjects (135+/-30 vs. 215+/-55 pg per milliliter [0.80+/-0.18 vs. 1.27+/-0.32 nmol per liter], P=0.001). Norepinephrine spillover in the arms increased to a similar extent in the two groups in response to each of the three stimuli, but the increases in the legs were smaller in the patients with the postural tachycardia syndrome than in the normal subjects (0.001+/-0.09 vs. 0.12+/-0.12 ng per minute per deciliter of tissue [0.006+/-0.53 vs. 0.71+/-0.71 nmol per minute per deciliter] with the cold pressor test, P=0.02; 0.02+/-0.07 vs. 0.23+/-0.17 ng per minute per deciliter [0.12+/-0.41 vs. 1.36+/-1.00 nmol per minute per deciliter] with nitroprusside infusion, P=0.01; and 0.008+/-0.09 vs. 0.19+/-0.25 ng per minute per deciliter [0.05+/-0.53 vs. 1.12+/-1.47 nmol per minute per deciliter] with tyramine infusion, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome results from partial sympathetic denervation, especially in the legs.__________________________________________________If anyone has the neuropathic variant of POTS, perhaps they can respond and describe how it was diagnosed and what treatments have helped --especially if the treatment is any different for this variant than for hyperadrenergic variant. I think some to many of us may not know which variant we have? That is my guess. I was never diagnosed with one or the other. The other thing I wonder is whether some of us have a combination of the two.I also don't know if or how the symptoms differ. Perhaps someone can answer that as well.Hope this helps Radha!Katherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tearose Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Oh my goodness, oh dear! Now what do we do? Katherine, Radha, but I have both the denervation and the norepinepherine spillover! Please don't tell me that this is an exception.Here is what I am thinking...This abstract is from 2000. That means the research is probably five years old. Maybe they have learned a lot more and have different ways of naming the kinds of pots/dysautonomias that are now idendified?I was taught that first they try to figure out the following: "a normal reaction to an abnormal condition" OR "an abnormal response to a normal condition" and then they figure out which chemical or nerves are involved.To make this clearer: I have an excessive release of norepinepherine which is my body's Normal response to denervation which is my abnormal condition. In someone who has a an excessive release of norepinepherine and NO denervation this would be considered an abnormal response to a normal condition. I do not know how they intrepret those people who have "receptors" who misintrepret the seratonin and this can also cause pots.I also thought the " hyper " response could be from other chemical imbalance OTHER than just norepinepherine...seratonin epinepherine....Maybe Michelle has someone on the DINET advisory board who could share the latest in information with us?still seeking answers...tearose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomtoGiuliana Posted March 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 TearoseI am equally, no, probably even more, confused.The reason I selected this article is that it is referenced by the article on mast cell activation disorder that was just published. I assumed they wouldn't refer to an out-of-date article?Tearose--your statement below..."someone who has a an excessive release of norepinepherine and NO denervation this would be considered an abnormal response to a normal condition. "I am not sure this is completely correct, b/c this excessive release may be a normal response to something other than denervation. I am thinking--hypovolemia would cause this response, but is hypovolemia only caused by denervation?OK, now I am really getting confused! Katherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tearose Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Well Katherine, let's think about this....not everyone has hypovolemia and denervation. You can have hypovolemia without denervation too.It would still hold true though, if the "abnormal condition" a defect in the body's ability to hold blood pressure (hypovolemia) brought the "normal response" for chemical release to get heart to pump oxygen to the brain.I would call this case the "normal response" to an "abnormal condition".In my previous post I was trying to demonstrate an example of the opposite: An "abnormal response" to a "normal condition"...let me try again....A person who has normal blood pressure and no denervation and no physiological comprimises is having an "abnormal release/response" of an adrenal chemical in a "normal body/condition"...from what I learned ...tearose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomtoGiuliana Posted March 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 OK, I think I have some better answers here now to clarify the definitions! Merrill sent me (again PDF form) the article referenced below. Thanks Merrill!! 2003--which is more current!! I pulled out the relevant material and pasted it below. What surprised me here the most is the statement that only about 10% of primary POTS patients are hyperadrenergic.This divides POTS patients into two classes--primary and secondary. Within primary the further classification is partial dysautonomic or hyperadrenergic, with partial dysautonomic reported to be far more common. However, the article also states that some primary POTS patients do not fit into either category-- and therefore there are probably other categories of primary POTS as yet undefined.Even the authors of this paper concede that these classifications are confusing and that there is still much more to be understood. What I pasted in below doesn't get into secondary POTS (caused by EDS, diabetes or other conditions). But the article does describe them.This looks like a great, basic article that would help begin to answer many POTS questions.__________________________________________The Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome:Definitions, Diagnosis, and ManagementYOUSUF KANJWAL, DAN KOSINSKI, and BLAIR P. GRUBBFrom the Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Medical College of Ohio,Toledo, OhioAugust 2003DefinitionsThe wide range of terms that have been usedto describe these disorders have made the literatureconfusing... [yeah--no kidding! )...Classification and Clinical FeaturesNot long after POTS was recognized, it becameincreasingly evident that the condition was probablycomposed of a heterogenous group of differentdisorders associated with similar clinical manifestations.While a number of different classificationshave been proposed, the one presented here seemsto be clinically useful and consistent with scientificevidence. It should be kept in mind that anysystem that attempts to classify natural phenom-enais, by its very nature, arbitrary and open todiscussion, debate, and revision over time.The present authors divide POTS into primaryand secondary forms. The primary forms tend tobe idiopathic and are not associated with other diseases.The secondary forms are usually seen in associationwith a particular disease or are known toarise secondary to a known biochemical or struc-turalabnormality.The primary forms are presently divided intotwo major subtypes. The first and largest sub-typeis referred to as the partial dysautonomicform. These patients appear to be suffering froma mild form of peripheral autonomic neuropathymanifested by an inability of the peripheral vasculatureto constrict adequately in response to orthostaticstress. They demonstrate an increase inheart rate and contractility while upright that rep-resentsa compensatory mechanism that attemptsto maintain systemic blood pressure and cerebralperfusion at adequate levels. While in the earlystages of this form of POTS, the increase in heartrate and contractibility may be fully compensatory,as the disorder progresses greater and greater de-greesof peripheral venous pooling occur, and pa-tientsbecome increasingly dependent on theirskeletal muscle pumps to maintain adequate ve-nousreturn. As upright venous pooling increasesthere is a progressive fall in ventricular preloadwith more baroreceptor unloading resulting in anincrease in sympathetic outflow. Some researchershave used microneurography and heart rate vari-abilityanalysis to measure sympathetic nerve ac-tivityin this form of POTS, finding that theydemonstrate an overall increase in adrenergic toneat rest and an enhanced postganglionic sympa-theticresponse to upright posture.22 However,serum catecholamine levels are usually normal orare only slightly elevated with upright posture.Transcranial Doppler studies have suggested thatsome symptoms in POTS may be due to an impair-mentof cerebrovascular regulation.30 One strikingclinical manifestation of the partial dysautonomicform of POTS will be the development of a deepmottled (almost bluish) discoloration of the lowerextremities after prolonged standing.28The majority of patients report that symptomsbegan suddenly after an acute febrile illness (pre-sumedto be viral).2 Other reported precipitatingevents have been pregnancy, immunization, sep-sis,surgery, and trauma.28 Presenting complaintsinclude palpitations, lightheadedness, extreme fa-tigue,exercise intolerance, cognitive impairment,visual blurring or tunneling, and weakness (partic-ularlyof the legs). Less frequent symptoms are anx-iety,nausea, chest wall pain, coldness, pain in theperipheral extremities, and abnormal sweating.31Patients often complain of headaches beginning inthe occipital region of the skull and radiation tothe shoulders. A feature of this form of POTS isthe cyclic nature of symptoms.29 Symptoms oftenworsen 4?5 days prior to menstruation. Some pa-tientsmay report occasional symptoms at rest as-sociatedwith changes in blood pressure and heartrate unrelated to arrhythmias. Holter monitoringtypically shows a sinus tachycardia, however si-nusbradycardia has also been seen.....A second (and less frequent) subtype of POTShas been identified where patients seem to man-ifesta form of ? -adrenergic receptor hypersensi-tivity,a disorder referred to as hyperadrenergicPOTS.26 While these patients share many char-acteristicswith those suffering from the partialdysautonomic form of POTS, they have severalunique features. Patients more commonly reporta long, slow onset of symptoms rather than a dra-maticabrupt one.Hyperadrenergic POTS patients often com-plainof extreme tremulousness, anxiety when up-right,and cold sweaty extremities.22 Some patientsmay experience a significant increase in urinaryoutput after a short time upright. Over half of thesepatients will suffer from true migraine headachesthat include a definite prodrome and unilateral (of-tenfrontal) onset with photophobia and nausea.32Many of these patients will display orthostatic hy-pertensionduring standing or tilt and an exagger-atedresponse to low dose isoproterenol infusionswhile supine (an increase of >30 beats/min afterreceiving 1 ?g/min of isoproterenol).33 It is unclearwhether this hypersensitivity is primary in natureor a manifestation of deinnervation sensitivity.34Many of these patients appear to have experiencedexcessive sympathetic activation in some neuronaldistribution nearly all the time, which is not appro-priatelymodulated by baroreflex activity.26 As op-posedto the partial dysautonomic POTS patients,the serum catecholamine levels of the hyperadren-ergicpatients are often significantly elevated dur-ingupright posture (serum norepinephrine levelsare often >600 ng/mL).It is likely that otherprimary forms of POTS will be elaborated overtime, as some patients do not fit well into theaforementioned groups. About 90% of the pri-maryPOTS patients appear to suffer from the par-tialdysautonomic form while only about ≤10%have the hyperadrenergic form (a small num-berof patients do not seem to fit into ei-thergrouping). Robertson et al.35 have reportedthat approximately 500,000 Americans may suf-ferfrom some form of POTS and orthostaticintolerance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avais1 Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Hi all,Here is information from Dr. Grubb's review in 2002. There appear to many POTS variants, some named, some not. Forgive, the typos, I didn't have the link anymore, so I had to hand type. 1) "The largest group of POTS patients appear to have a mild form of Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy (a partial dysautonomia) - in which an inability to increase peripheral vascular resistance during upright posture results in excessive compensatory postural tachycardia. Venous pooling appears to be present."2) "A second group of patients may have a component of Beta-Receptor Supersensitivity. Many investigators have called this HYPERADRENERGIC Orthostatic Intolerance to describe this subset. Many of these patients complain of extreme tremulousness, and anxiety in addition to palpitations and tachycardia while standing. Serum catecholamine levels are quite high (norepinepherine levels are often >600 ng/ml). It is unclear whether this supersensitivity is primary in nature, or due to some secondary denervation supersensitivity. This excessive sympathetic activation is not appropriately attenuated by baroreflex mechanisms. While these patients SHARE a number of characteristics WITH those who suffer from the Partial Dysautonomia Form of POTS, THE HYPERADRENERGICS MORE OFTEN COMPLAIN OF TREMOR, MIGRAINE HEADACHE, AND COLD AND SWEATY EXTREMITIES. "3) "Recent data have suggested a third type exists - those with Ehlers-Danlos III Syndrome. These patients demontrate reduced vascular reactivity and failure to constrict during upright posture."4) "The term SECONDARY POTS is applied to those patients with a known autonomic disorder with preserved cardiac innervation depite peripheral outonomic denervation. This can be due to diseases such as diabetes, amyloidosis, Sjogren's syndrome, or Lupus. " Does this help you guys and gals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomtoGiuliana Posted March 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Thanks avais1this corresponds to everything stated above, except that your material classifies EDS patients differently (as separate from secondary POTS instead of a subset of secondary POTS). It's great to see it all stated again, and very clearly too.Thanks. Radha--is this what you were looking for?!Katherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avais1 Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Oh too funny! I looked at the time badges on the replies - we must have been typing at about the same time . I think we both were even looking at the same (definitely similar) article . Oh well, better too much than too little info! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawnA Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Thanks guys for sharing this valuable information. I guess I fit into the secondary POTS category. I definitely have neuropathy but also have symptoms of hyperadernergic POTS. I have not had any of the blood test. Interesting stuff.Dawn A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomtoGiuliana Posted March 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 avais--oh yes, I see that now. Well, and I agree, more info is better than less on this confusing topic.DawnA--I think the two types of POTS do have overlapping symptoms, so it wouldn't be unusual to have symptoms of both. Without the testing, it may not be possible to determine what you have based on symptoms alone (except to guess). Anyway, like I said before, I am not sure that knowing what type you have generally informs the treatment regime at this point.Katherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calypso Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 This is all very interesting. I don't think I fit into any of these categories completely -- since I have hot, dry extremities much of the time (except when my hands are exposed to the cold, which is when they ache and immediately freeze up); I don't have headaches; I am always, always having a high heart rate and only have a mild drop in BP on standing; I do have twitching/tremors; I do have feelings of too much adrenaline; but my EMG shows my nerves are intact and don't have denervation (despite not being able to feel my fingers lately).I think the bottom line is that POTS attacks our bodies differently because we are all different to begin with. I don't think any of us have the same exact symptoms -- we share certain ones, but have things that are unique or some that are shared with others who seem nothing like us. For instance, I don't have malignant hypertension, but Morgan and I share some symptoms. But then I also share some with Tearose, who has low blood pressure. I have mostly normal BP.Nevertheless, it's interesting to hear all of this research and debate. At the least, it may give us some ideas on what meds might help us best.Amy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morgan617 Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 I think my overriding is neuropathic, but that I have overlapping symptoms also. I think is quite common just due to the compexities of this disease. My bp never really dropped, it was always a tachycardic problem. Since the ablation, the more my heart tries to increase and can't, the more arrythmias I get. My feet have started turning a mottly color since the sudden drop in my bp, and my knees, I know, that's a weird one. But all this is very interesting. I guess when it comes down to it pots is pots, but it is sort of nice to have some idea of what is going on. My doctor will find this interesting I'm sure. The thing is, all I've had are the most basic tests, which come out normal and so no doctors believe me, but this verifies that. My nephrologist says my body always thinks it's dry even if it's not. Interesting..... morgan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radha Posted March 11, 2005 Report Share Posted March 11, 2005 thanks to all of you for your valuable input, its very confusing! i have symptoms of both, have sweaty extremities, terrible headaches, anxiety, but low bp, so i dont know either, and i cant have that blood test done since i cant stand at all, so i guess i will just have to live with unanswered questions, thanks again to all of you for taking the time to explain things, radha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaceyYount Posted March 11, 2005 Report Share Posted March 11, 2005 Thanks I understand a bit more but one question. One doctor said that I had the hyperadregenric form of POTS but I don't think I have ever had my serum catecholamine levels/norepinepherine levels ever taken while I was standing, I did have a 24 urine catecholimine test but I think that is different yes?. I think I have a crossover of both but I guess my question is should I have those tested to see if I do have that form becuase maybe it would be a way for me to be treated wiht something as of right now I am on no meds to treat this due to intolerence.Hope this makes since my brain is not working!Stacey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunnerGirl Posted March 11, 2005 Report Share Posted March 11, 2005 This is a really fascinating discussion and I appreciate what everyone has contributed. I think Tearose posted something similar on another thread, but here is my understanding of hyperadrenergic autonomic dysfunction, per discussions with various doctors. One of two things is happening in our bodies: 1) We have a NORMAL response to ABNORMAL levels of adrenaline (ie, our bodies produce too much adrenaline either continuously or upon postural changes, etc. and our bodies are simply responding 'appropriately' to that excess adrenaline with HR and BP increases, sweating, feeling anxious, tremors, etc.) The issue here is WHAT IS CAUSING the excess adrenaline. Sometimes a cause can be pinpointed and treated: an adrenal gland tumor (pheo), panic or anxiety disorders, hypoglycemia, etc. can all cause an excess outpouring of adrenaline. Fix the underlying problem and the excess adrenaline goes away. But for many of us, these conditions have been ruled out, and the cause of our excess adrenaline is idiopathic. Maybe it's a chemical imbalance in the brain, but we just don't know. So, we're left with treating the symptoms, not the cause, since we don't know what it is. We take beta blockers to reduce HR and/or BP, we take anti-anxiety meds to curb those horrible excess adrenaline feelings, we take SSRIs because they may help rewire our brains and mitigate symptoms. OR....2) We have an ABNORMAL (hyper-sensitive or over-reactive) response to NORMAL levels of adrenaline. I have had my catecholomines measured on numerous occasions and every time they have fallen into the normal range - even when I've been symptomatic (my BP was 160/90 before one blood draw and I was very tachy). So I clearly fall into this second category. But the issue again is WHY is my body so reactive to adrenaline? Are the receptors in my heart's sinus node and along my sympathetic nervous system more numerous, more sensitive, etc. Do I have an imbalance in my brain chemistry that is telling my nervous system to react this way? There are lots of theories, but the fact remains that we are still left with treating the symptoms of excess adrenaline - even though, technically speaking, we don't have "excess adrenaline" - in these cases, too. Beta blockers, SSRIs, benzos, etc. - things to 'tone down' the reactivity of the autonomic nervous system. All of this is a round about way of saying that it's interesting to know what form of dysautonomia we have, but treatment is still dictated by symptom management. The condition is so poorly understood, in part because, as others have stated, it manifests itself so differently in its sufferers. I look forward to the day when we will be able to pinpoint the cause of our disease (not just the form of it), and ultimately cure it (not just manage it). RG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geneva Posted March 12, 2005 Report Share Posted March 12, 2005 Katherine/Merrill, can you post a link to where we can access the full document?This is a very interesting topic! I am going to try to process the new information and maybe take to my next doctor visit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomtoGiuliana Posted March 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2005 RGThanks for your excellent summary. You explain very clearly why, regardless of which type of primary POTS you have, treatments at this point are the same, as the goal is symptom control--not fixing what has gone wrong.This discussion has clarified a lot for me and it is frankly very interesting! Thank you Radha for bringing this question up!Katherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramakentesh Posted March 13, 2005 Report Share Posted March 13, 2005 If i were to look at those two types of POTS i would say that i probalby fall More into the second catagory, rather than the first - that is i dont have pooling in my legs, i do have hypovolumia and i do have constant hand tremors that are worsened by standing and i get migraine-type phenonema.My doctor sort of put POTS to me a different way. He said that basically, there are a variety of possible causes - some patients have low blood volume, others have blood pooling, others just have such an overactive response to orthostatic stress that the adrenaline actually further constricts the arteries to the brain resulting in even greater dizziness, and as a result even more tachycardia and tremors.He feels that the distinctions are just really speculative at present, but that there are three or so different manifestations that he sees. At the end of the day, despite what is causing it, the autonomic nervous system will go into overactivity to compensate - resulting in very similar symptoms.The thing about the migraines is that POTS causes a type of 'false' migraine. He explained to me in detail how a classic migraine will constrict arteries before it actually dilates them - and in POTS patients there seems to be a mechanism where the arteries go into constriction causing a varierty of odd migraine-like symptoms, but enver result in a true migraine.He said that most patients find that once POTS is on the scene, a patients migraines will be more frequent, but different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leah1321 Posted March 13, 2005 Report Share Posted March 13, 2005 So weird thing for me is that I definitely have hyperadrenergic POTS that developed slowly starting from infancy. However, I got mono in high school and developed NCS that was severe for a while and has improved somewhat with therapy. I have recently been diagnosed with Lupus. I think that I do have two very different responses depending on how I am feeling and what I am doing. Sometimes my bp shoots up at first when I stand. Sometimes it stays the same or falls. My heartrate always increases. I have NEVER had anxiety, but I have tremulousness, cold, sweaty extremities, true migraines with a terrible prodrome (and starting in infancy) and high bp at times. I think I may be the person with primary hyperadrenergic POTS who then developed a secondary type autonomic disorder following a virus. Why wouldn't it attack a place that was already affected? I wonder if that makes sense? My docs have always said I was different. I wonder if all of us can be categorized? I feel like everyone is different and it is hard to delineate since I think some of us get adrenaline responses with secondary POTS. hmm.Leah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.