Michelle Sawicki Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Hi everyone,Here is an abstract to new research regarding POTS and pregnancy:1: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;32(8):1000-3.Outcomes of pregnancy in patients with preexisting postural tachycardia syndrome.Kanjwal K, Karabin B, Kanjwal Y, Grubb BP.Pacing and Electrophysiology section, Division of Cardiology, Department ofMedicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio 43614, USA.BACKGROUND: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) occurs more commonlyin women than in men and often affects women of childbearing age. Many of thesewomen wish to have children, yet there are little reported data on the outcomesof pregnancy in patients with POTS. To date there has been one report of twopatients with POTS who successfully completed pregnancy. We report the outcomesof 22 women with preexisting POTS who became pregnant. OBJECTIVE: To assess theoutcome of pregnancy in patients with preexisting POTS. METHODS AND RESULTS:Twenty-two patients, age 30 +/- 7 years, with POTS became pregnant. Migraine was the common comorbidity found in 40% of patients. Medications used werebeta-blockers (18%), midiodrine (31%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(31%), fludrocortisone (13%), combination (40%), and none (18%). Duringpregnancy, symptoms of POTS remained unchanged in three (13%), improved in 12(55%), and worsened in seven (31%) patients. One patient who had recurrentepisodes of syncope without aura was found to have complete heart block andreceived a cardiac pacemaker. All patients completed pregnancy successfully.There were no stillbirths. One patient developed hyperemesis. Eighteen patientshad vaginal delivery and four patients delivered by cesarian section. No othercomplications of pregnancy were encountered. Congenital abnormalities wereencountered in the form of one atrial septal defect, one ventricular septaldefect, and one Down's syndrome. Postpartum symptoms of POTS remained stable in15 (69%) patients and worsened in seven (31%) patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our observation, patients with POTS can safely complete pregnancy if they desire todo so. POTS should not be considered a contraindication to pregnancy per se.PMID: 19659618 [PubMed - in process]-Michelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janiedelite Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Awesome! Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firewatcher Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Is this part of the results of the info that Doctorguest wanted from those of us who had been pregnant or another study? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliegee Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 I wondered the same thing, Jennifer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worththewords Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Thanks for sharing, Michelle! This is comforting to read! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MomtoGiuliana Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 I'm glad to see a study that supports use of meds during pregnancy. I think it would be daunting for some to try going off all meds during pregnancy, and it seems that is what is always recommended--at least by cardiologists. This article reflects how very different the variants of POTS are (some improved some got worse, etc) and therefore that each patient needs to be assessed individually and each patient needs to evaluate whether pregnancy is the best choice for her. Also this was such a tiny study, so it points to the need for continued research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunfish Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 firewatcher et al -i'm fairly sure that this study is entirely separate from any of the the info doctorguest was collecting. melissa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firewatcher Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 firewatcher et al -i'm fairly sure that this study is entirely separate from any of the the info doctorguest was collecting. melissaThanks Melissa, it did not sound the same, but I wondered. I am glad that this is being investigated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.