Jump to content

Droxidopa


Recommended Posts

Chelsea Theraputics is once again recruiting for a study on the use of Droxidopa to treat Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension. They will continue to recruit for the next few months. Anyone who thought about signing up but missed the enrollment window has another chance.

The previous study failed to demonstrate that Droxidopa improved dizziness in people suffering from Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension. This imperiled Chelsea's application for FDA approval, so they appealed for permission to do a new study. In their appeal, Chelsea argued that the symptoms of orthostatic hypotension encompass more than just dizzyness. The FDA agreed and now they're going to measure whether Droxidopa improves a wider range of symptoms.

Do other people out there agree with me that this seems fair? Hypotension can make a person feel lousy without necessarily making them dizzy, and, the degree of dizzyness a hypotensive experiences does not always correlate with their fatigue or brain fog? Or am I thinking wishfully because I want Droxidopa to be an effective treatment for autonomic disorders?

I got all this information from Chelsea's website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are repeating the trial because in theory it should work in any postural hypotension where sympathetic underactivity is the underlying problem.

It has been trialled unofficially in POTS and the results were not encouraging - despite some doctors touting it as the next medication on the horizon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are repeating the trial because in theory it should work in any postural hypotension where sympathetic underactivity is the underlying problem.

That is very interesting to hear. Do you remember where you came across that information? I read the company's report on why they were doing a retrial, and all they said was that the measurement of dizzyness was too narrow and they felt like a new study with a broader measure and additional test subjects would have more power and hence less of a chance of a type II statistical error.

>It has been trialled unofficially in POTS and the results were not encouraging - despite some doctors touting it as the next >

medication on the horizon...

Do you remember where and by whom it was trialed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...