Guest tearose Posted January 31, 2012 Report Posted January 31, 2012 Does anyone remember the type of compression that was mentioned a couple of years ago that could help with keeping blood pressure up especially during airflight?I tend to have many sets of SVTs if the cabin is not pressurized adequately. I am trying to figure out any possibility of flying again.thanks,tearose Quote
McBlonde Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Oh... I remember that being posted. Let me see if I can find it on Google. Quote
martiz Posted February 21, 2012 Report Posted February 21, 2012 I would be very interested in this. I purchased a g-suit last year and I think it would have been helpful. Mine was used and it leaked so, I sent it back. Also, it was a little too long (I am short). AND, the band that goes around your back end to keep the abdominal airbag pressed in aggravated my spinal stenosis/sciatica.It was a little bulky but I would have worn it if it helped. The nice thing is that the one I had (an old military version) was cotton so it wasn't as hot as compression hose and the areas that sweat were exposed - back of the knees, groin, etc. The problem that I see is that most of the blood pooling for me seems to be in the abdominal area and I don't get much pooling in my feet (some in my legs) so regular compression hose were not that helpful.Dr. Medow did a webinar on hypoperfusion and he felt the perctanges were greater in the splanchic area so I am not sure how effective these suits are.Here is link to the webinar:http://www.cfids.org/webinar/oi-march2010.wmvand to the slideshttp://www.cfids.org/webinar/oi-slides-32510.pdfIf you notice on Pg 19, the thorax area loses 30% and the splanchnic gains 30% then the pelvis and leg are at about 10% (the SAME as the controls).then page 35 - the brain loses 20% blood flow during TTT.This is why I don't wear compression hose anymore (they're too hot and that is a trigger, they're too expensive, too hard to get on - leaves me exhausted and for the number of times I have to go to the bathroom - not worth the hassle). Then to see these types of numbers makes me wonder if these POTS doctors keep up with the research. And this research is from 2010! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.