Jump to content



Recommended Posts

Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky

Mercury Vapors Not Easily Absorbed by Body

By Jeanie Lerche Davis

WebMD Medical News Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario, MD

on Thursday, December 09, 2004

Dec. 9, 2004 -- Mercury in dental fillings does not cause Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, or other health problems, according to a new review of all current research.

But will this put to rest the concerns many people have?

It's a sensitive issue. Methyl mercury is the type found in fish, and has been found harmful to the brain in large amounts. The EPA advises women to avoid eating mercury-rich fish during pregnancy for that reason.

However, mercury in dental fillings is a different type of chemical compound -- an amalgam or blend of copper, silver, and mercury. Dentists have used this blended metal for more than 150 years. But over the years, concerns about mercury fillings have been raised, writes Meryl Karol, PhD, an epidemiologist with the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health.

Karol chaired the expert panel whose research review was released today. Scientists from the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the FDA, the CDC, and the Public Health Service's chief dental officer, were among those experts.

The Evidence

Only 300 studies published since 1996 had sufficient merit to be included in their report -- studies that analyzed mercury in urine samples as a marker for mercury exposure. Methyl mercury from fish is not found in urine samples, explains Karol.

Large population studies, animal toxicity studies, and studies of effects from various levels of mercury exposure were included. Researchers also looked at whether it was biologically possible for mercury vapor from fillings to cause brain disorders and other health problems, she notes.

The panel's conclusion: "Current research is insufficient to attribute various complaints to mercury in dental amalgam," writes Karol. Even those people with allergic reaction to dental amalgam "did not have high levels in their blood," she adds.

Also among the panel's conclusions:

The evidence showed that mercury vapor is released from dental work and absorbed in the body. However, about 95% of people in the studies had mercury levels at or lower than the level deemed harmful by the WHO. The long-term use of nicotine chewing gum (over two years) combined with intense chewing and more than 20 dental amalgam surfaces presents the greatest chance that urine mercury measurements exceed the general population and approach a level seen in people who have occupational exposure to mercury. However, the reports state that adverse health effects for long-term nicotine gum chewers was not evaluated.

Bruxism (grinding teeth) and dental amalgam placement and removal appear to have less impact on exposure than the use of nicotine chewing gum.

Allergic sensitivity to dental amalgam seems to affect a small percentage of people.

Insufficient research has been done to support or refute whether dental amalgam causes antibiotic resistance in the human gut or that it may cause any autoimmune disease including multiple sclerosis.

Three studies also failed to support a role of dental amalgam as a factor in the development of Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's disease.

Human studies have failed to support or refute a link between dental amalgam with brain damage in a developing fetus.

Both methyl mercury from fish and mercury from dental amalgam have been found in breast milk. Rat studies show that high exposure of mercury vapor among pregnant rats and monkeys induces behavioral abnormalities -- but no studies have looked at whether low-level exposures affect brain development.

Although some people undergo chelation therapy to treat their symptoms, animal studies have shown that chelation therapy works to bind and remove mercury from the kidneys, but not from the brain, Karol notes. However, chelation carries a host of problems -- possible adverse health problems including headaches, dizziness, nausea, and the loss of essential metals.

Chemicals used in chelation therapy have been harmful to the developing fetus, she adds.

Why Mercury Fillings Are Safe

Mercury amalgam fillings "are 100% safe," says Cynthia Trajtenberg, DDS, professor of restorative dentistry and dental biomaterials specialist at the University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston. She was not involved in today's report, but offered her insights.

The safety "all depends on how molecules are combined," she tells WebMD. "Salt is sodium chloride, but if you put pure chloride on your steak you will die. If chloride is combined with sodium, it's safe; it's even a nutritional element. It's the same with mercury. Mercury in dental fillings is combined with silver and copper, and is transformed into a stable metal material that is not easily released into the oral cavity. Therefore, it is not harmful."

One study showed that it would take 300 tooth restorations to create mercury toxicity -- "but that's impossible because we only have 32 teeth," she tells WebMD. "Eating salmon and deep sea fish more than twice a week gives more mercury than a single amalgam."

Several medical societies including the American Dental Association, the Alzheimer's Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Multiple Sclerosis Society all agree there is no proven link between silver or amalgam fillings and mercury toxicity that can cause neurological disease, Trajtenberg adds.

"There's a lot of misunderstanding in the medical community about this," she adds. "I get a lot of patients requesting total replacement of fillings because their doctor said they were harmful. It creates a lot of anxiety among patients, but it is not evidence-based. In Germany, there have been cases of metal reactions to fillings. But not usually to amalgam fillings -- it's with gold."

It's true that medical symptoms -- like headaches, tremors, mood swings -- may lead people to suspect mercury toxicity, she says. "But it's not related to small doses from dental restorations. We always want physicians to do further tests with their patients to look for neurological or psychiatric disorders that may cause similar symptoms."

The report was funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and coordinated by The Life Sciences Research Office, Inc., a nonprofit, independent research group in Bethesda, Md.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't looking but stumbled on this one too

Help YourSelf

Filling You In

Since the 1820's, dentists have been using a combination of mercury, silver, tin and zinc to create the "silver" or amalgam fillings that most of us have in our mouths. But just how safe are they? The American Dental Association (ADA) states that amalgam fillings have been safely used for 150 years. However, a growing number of researchers and dentists believe that amalgam fillings may pose an unrecognized health risk.

Mercury, which comprises about 50% of the amalgam filling, is one of the most toxic elements on the planet. The harmful effects of mercury are almost too numerous to count. Many of us know about the mercury warnings issued periodically for lake fish, and about the danger posed by a broken mercury thermometer -- but did you also know that when amalgam fillings are removed, they go straight to the toxic waste dump?

A study conducted in 1993 by Tufts University School of Medicine suggests that amalgam fillings can create bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. Other studies have linked amalgam fillings to headaches and depression, gastrointestinal distress, and even chronic fatigue and multiple sclerosis. However, much of this information remains in dispute. It's also important to keep in mind that diseases are complex, and many factors are often involved.

The American Dental Association has issued numerous statements asserting that when mercury is mixed with other components in the filling, stable compounds are formed, and only trace amounts of mercury remain. According to their research, there is no convincing evidence that trace amounts of mercury have any effect on humans. In addition, the existing alternatives to amalgams -- porcelain, natural resins, and other composite materials -- are considerably more expensive and tend to be less durable. So strongly does the ADA stands by its position, that if a dentist recommends removal of amalgam fillings, they may be found guilty of a breach of ethics, and can be disciplined. The Food and Drug Administration, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and the Consumers Union (publishers of Consumer Reports) are three of many national organizations that support the ADA's position.

Nonetheless, the ADA is working to develop a mercury-free tooth filling that may someday provide an affordable and long-lasting alternative. Meanwhile, Sweden, Denmark and Austria have all banned amalgam fillings, and Germany has issued advisories against the use of amalgams in pregnant women and people with kidney problems.

So, are your fillings safe? As with so many other health care questions, the answer could be 'yes and no'. It's best to do your own research and decide for yourself. For more information, and links to websites, please go to the Tell Me More section and check out the reading list.

And by the way, if you do break a mercury thermometer, never use a vacuum cleaner! Remove children and pets from the area. Clean up the beaded mercury by carefully rolling it onto a sheet of paper, or using an eyedropper. Pack it up in an airtight container, along with the eyedropper, and anything else it has touched, and dispose of it according to the guidelines provided by your health department. Don't just throw it in the trash. Ventilate the room with fans, and try to close off the rest of the house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are several sentences in the second report that are complete Bulls%#@. this one, for example: "did you also know that when amalgam fillings are removed, they go straight to the toxic waste dump?" (A filling is essentially destroyed by the drill when the tooth is worked on.) Also: "if a dentist recommends removal of amalgam fillings, they may be found guilty of a breach of ethics" Nevermind the problem with pronouns in that sentence ... but have you ever heard of someone filing suit because the dentist did his/her job? I haven't had a "silver" filling in a gazillion years--there ARE better materials out there ... and slowly but surely I've had the old silver fillings that were in my mouth replaced...because they DON'T last forever (nothing does) ... and when a dentist recommends removal, it's because s/he's observing degradation of the original filling!

I suppose it's good to hear more than one side to an issue ... but sheesh. I was first feeling excited to read an article that had good news to report. I guess there's always a way to ruin a good feeling. Stick with the first report, folks. It's FAR more authoritative!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On issues like this, I always check quackwatch.org Quackwatch has summaries of the science behind issues you may read about in the news. The site can be a little much to sift through, but you can search the site's contents for key words, like "mercury" and you'll come up with the relevant articles.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...